I Believe People Fall in Love With the Wrong Things First

Riya Singh
6 Min Read

There is a quiet honesty to Imtiaz Ali’s films that often arrives late. Sometimes years later. Sometimes after heartbreak. Sometimes when you are older and no longer sure what you are chasing. His cinema does not rush to explain itself. It waits. Like his characters do.

Imtiaz Ali has never been interested in perfect love stories. He is interested in the wrong ones. The incomplete ones. The ones that bruise before they heal. The ones where people fall in love with the idea of freedom, success, validation, escape and only later realise they were running away from themselves.

That belief runs through every film he has made.

Love Is Never the First Answer in His Films

In Jab We Met, what looks like a bubbly romantic comedy is actually a film about two people shedding versions of themselves they were performing for the world. Geet is not loud because she is confident. She is loud because she is afraid of being ignored. Aditya is not quiet because he is calm. He is quiet because he has already given up.

Their love does not save them. Their self realisation does.

This is Imtiaz’s recurring truth. Love does not arrive to fix you. It arrives after you confront what you were running from.

Rockstar Was Never About Romance

Years later, Rockstar made this philosophy painfully clear. Jordan does not fall in love with Heer. He falls in love with the idea of suffering. He mistakes pain for depth. He believes art must be born from heartbreak and in doing so destroys the one thing that gave him peace.

Imtiaz has often spoken about how people misunderstand Rockstar as a tragic love story when it is actually a cautionary tale. Jordan chooses ambition over intimacy. He chooses chaos over comfort. Heer becomes collateral damage in his pursuit of greatness.

Love was never the destination. Ego was.

Tamasha Asked the Question Nobody Wanted to Answer

Tamasha is perhaps Imtiaz Ali’s most misunderstood film because it demands something uncomfortable from its audience. Honesty. Ved is not confused because society is cruel. He is confused because he is lying to himself.

Tara does not fall in love with Ved’s potential. She falls in love with the version of him that exists only when no one is watching. The tragedy is not that Ved changes. It is that he thinks he must.

Imtiaz does not romanticise rebellion. He romanticises alignment. And alignment is hard.

Highway and the Idea of Freedom Through Pain

In Highway, freedom does not come from rescue. It comes from surrender. Veera finds peace not in safety but in truth. Mahabir is not her saviour. He is her mirror.

This is where Imtiaz’s ideology becomes deeply uncomfortable. He does not equate morality with healing. He equates honesty with healing. Veera does not become free because she escapes her captor. She becomes free because she finally names her trauma.

Love in this film is not romantic. It is existential.

Love Aaj Kal and the Generational Confusion

Both versions of Love Aaj Kal explore the same idea through different lenses. That love today is burdened by choice, ambition, and fear of missing out. Imtiaz believes modern love fails not because people feel less, but because they think too much.

People fall in love with convenience first. With timing. With potential. With optics. With how love looks rather than how it feels.

And then they wonder why it does not last.

Laila Majnu and the Beauty of Being Misunderstood

Laila Majnu remains one of Imtiaz Ali’s most quietly devastating works. Often overlooked, often misunderstood, it strips love of glamour entirely. Qais does not lose his mind because he loves Laila. He loses his mind because society refuses to let love exist without conditions.

This film is not about obsession. It is about transcendence. Love here is spiritual. Lonely. Inconvenient. And deeply misunderstood.

Imtiaz treats madness not as a flaw but as a consequence of loving honestly in a dishonest world.

Why His Films Age Better Than They Release

Audiences often reject Imtiaz Ali’s films on first watch because they are not designed for immediacy. They are designed for memory. You do not understand Tamasha at twenty. You feel it at thirty. You do not grasp Rockstar in heartbreak. You understand it after healing.

His cinema trusts time.

He believes people fall in love with the wrong things first. With noise. With validation. With drama. And only later learn how quiet real connection actually is.

That is why his films linger.

They are not meant to entertain you.
They are meant to wait for you.

And when you finally return to them, they feel like they were written just for who you have become.